翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Law on the state education ・ Law on the Status of the Descendants of the Petrović Njegoš Dynasty ・ Law on Use of Languages and Scripts of National Minorities ・ Law or Loyalty ・ Law Point ・ Law Practice Magazine ・ Law practice management ・ Law practice management software ・ Law practice optimization ・ Law Preservation Party ・ Law Preview ・ Law Promontory ・ Law Publishers in Europe ・ Law Quarterly Review ・ Law reform ・ Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 ・ Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 ・ Law Reform (Husband and Wife) Act 1962 ・ Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948 ・ Law Reform (Year and a Day Rule) Act 1996 ・ Law Reform Act ・ Law Reform Advisory Committee ・ Law Reform Commission (Ireland) ・ Law Reform Commission of New South Wales ・ Law Reform Commission of Western Australia ・ Law Reform Committee ・ Law report ・ Law Reports ・ Law review ・ Law school Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 ： ウィキペディア英語版 Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, which allows a judge to apportion liability for compensatory damages as he feels to be "just and equitable" between a tortfeasor and an injured person who was partly to blame. ==Historical background== Until the Act was passed, English tort law had held that contributory negligence was a full defence to negligence. This rule composed what is sometimes called the "unholy trinity" of defences to negligence which wrought particular hardship on 19th century workers, and barred them from any compensation for ghastly workplace injuries (the other two are common employment〔''Priestly v Fowler'' (1837) 3 Mees & Wels 1〕 and ''volenti non fit injuria''). It meant that if an employer was 99% at fault for his worker being mangled in his machinery, but the worker was 1% at fault, then the worker could recover nothing in compensation for injuries. Outside the workplace, an example of the defence is found in ''Waite v North-Eastern Railway Co''〔(1858) EB&E 719〕 where a grandmother and an infant that were hit by a negligently driven train were barred from any claim. The Act was passed by the new Labour government following World War II, along with a number of other workplace safety and common law reforms (e.g., Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948). This common law rule subsisted longer in other countries than in the United Kingdom. An example is seen in ''The Wagon Mound (No 1)'' where the claimant conceded that a burning ship accident was unforeseeable in order to avoid the contemporary Australian contributory negligence bar. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.